Effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on two different performance indicators in sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Article information

Phys Act Nutr. 2021;25(1):7-15

Publication date (electronic) : 2021 March 31

doi : https://doi.org/10.20463/pan.2021.0002

Ramon Souza Lino ¹, Laura Souza Lagares ¹, Caio Victor Coutinho Oliveira ², Ciro Oliveira Queiroz ¹, Lélia Lessa Teixeira Pinto ¹, Luiz Alberto Bastos Almeida ³, Eric Simas Bonfim ⁴, Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos Santos^,¹^,

¹Research and Study Group on Health and Human Performance, Bahian School of Medicine and Public Health, Bahia, Brazil

²Department of Nutrition, UNIFACISA University Center, Paraiba, Brazil

³Department of Physical Education, Feira de Santana State University, Bahia, Brazil

⁴Obesity Treatment and Surgery Center, Bahia, Brazil

^*Corresponding author : Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos Santos Rua Silveira Martins, 3386, Cabula, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil Tel: +51-71-99110-0648 E-mail: clarcson@hotmail.com

Received 2021 January 6; Revised 2021 February 19; Accepted 2021 February 23.

Abstract

[Purpose]

Sodium bicarbonate shows ergogenic potential in physical exercise and sports activities, although there is no strong evidence which performance markers show the greatest benefit from this supplement. This study evaluated the effects of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on time trial performance and time to exhaustion in athletes and sports practitioners.

[Methods]

A systematic review was conducted using three databases, including 17 clinical trials. Among these clinical trials, 11 were considered eligible for the meta-analysis according to the criteria for the assessment of methodological quality using the PEDro Scale. Time to exhaustion was assessed in six studies, while time trial performance was evaluated in five studies.

[Results]

A significant beneficial effect of supplementation on time to exhaustion was found in a random effects model (1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 2.48). There was no significant effect of supplementation on time trial performance in a fixed effects model (slope = −0.75; 95% CI, −2.04 to 0.55) relative to a placebo group.

[Conclusion]

Sodium bicarbonate has the potential to improve sports performance in general, especially in terms of time to exhaustion.

Keywords: sodium bicarbonate; performance; supplementation; endurance

INTRODUCTION

The use of nutritional supplements as ergogenic resources has been shown to be efficient, as it delays the emergence of fatigue and increases the contractility of the skeletal muscle, improving the ability to perform physical activities and consequently improving sports performance [1,2]. Fatigue is defined as any reduction in the ability to produce strength or power in a muscle or a group of muscles induced by exercise [3]. Although its precise etiology remains controversial, the accumulation of H⁺ and concomitant reduction in sarcoplasmic pH are considered to be the main causes of fatigue caused by training [4,5].

Taking into consideration the buffering capacity for the removal of H⁺ ions and the delay in the inhibition of glycolytic enzymes (especially phosphofructokinase), the use of nutritional supplements is a relevant approach to improving performance [1,6]. According to the American College of Sports Medicine, many substances are potentially effective in improving buffering capacity, including sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) [7]. Consequently, it is believed that supplementation with alkalizing agents before exercise can reduce the metabolic acidosis that occurs during heavy exercise, increasing the buffering capacity, and delaying the start of acidosis and fatigue [4,8].

McNaughton et al. [9] showed that NaHCO₃ supplementation is efficient in athletes who practice a variety of exercises, such as supramaximal exercise and intermittent high-intensity activity. Previously published studies have demonstrated an improvement in acute muscle resistance in strength training [10], delayed ventilatory threshold at Crossfit [11], improvement in lactate buffering in cyclists [12], greater glycolytic contribution in taekwondo [13], and increased time to fatigue in long-distance road running [14].

Although these studies have explored the effects of acute NaHCO₃ intake, according to various aspects of performance, there are still gaps in the literature regarding acute and/or chronic supplementation and its effects on time trial performance and time to exhaustion. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on time trial performance and time to exhaustion in athletes and sports practitioners.

METHODS

Experimental design

The study was a systematic review with meta-analysis performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [14].

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Clinical trials that evaluated the effects of NaHCO₃ supplementation on sports performance, specifically in time trial performance and/or time to exhaustion, in athletes and sports practitioners who were healthy and had had NaHCO₃ supplementation before sports performance with a control group for comparison were included. Studies that used another supplement associated with NaHCO₃, did not have a defined intervention protocol, or observed secondary performance outcomes were excluded.

Data extraction

The PubMed, Scopus (Science Direct), and Virtual Health Library (VHB-BVS in Latin America) databases were searched for studies that had been published until 2020 in Portuguese, English, Spanish, or German. The latest included study was published on January 29, 2020.

Search strategy

The following search terms were used for the PubMed database using synonyms for sodium bicarbonate and performance found in the MeSH and Health Science Descriptors (Decs): (((((performance) OR athletic performance) OR sports performance) OR sports performances) OR athletic performances)) AND ((((sodium bicarbonate) OR carbonic acid monosodium salt) OR sodium hydrogen carbonate) OR baking soda).

Quality assessment

The research was conducted by two independent researchers using the adopted search strategy and the databases mentioned above. Duplicate articles were removed, and filtering was performed according to eligibility criteria based initially on the study titles, followed by the abstracts and full text. The remaining studies were filed according to the PICO strategy, included in the systematic review, and filtered through the PEDro Scale [15] for the identification of risk of bias and assessment of methodological quality. Those with ≥7 points on the PEDro scale were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A third evaluator was included when there were divergent results.

Statistical analysis

The studies included in the meta-analysis were grouped according to the performance outcome subgroup. The standardized mean difference was used, according to Cohen’s d, for the analysis of results. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran’s q test and tests of inconsistency for the analysis of symmetry and asymmetry in the funnel plot. In cases of high heterogeneity, defined as I² ≥50%, a random-effects model was used. For heterogeneity with values <50%, a fixed-effects model was used. The size of the individual-specific effect was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 from the Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.

Register

The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) is an international database of systematic reviews. Among the criteria for acceptance and registration, the systematic review must have a solely and exclusively health-related outcome. The present study does not meet the criteria for registration as it has a performance-related outcome.

RESULTS

Selection of studies

Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the search process and identification of studies to be included in the systematic review with meta-analysis. Initially, 172 articles were identified and 11 articles were included in the final analysis.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of the literature search and selection process - PRISMA.

Characteristics of the studies

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 17 clinical trials that were included in the systematic review, with a total of 393 participants aged 18 to 35 years. The studies were published until January 2020 and evaluated the effects of NaHCO₃ supplementation in diverse sports and varied evaluative and supplementary protocols.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 17 clinical trials included in the systematic review

Classification of risk of bias

Table 2 shows the clinical trials included in the systematic review and their respective PEDro Scale scores; Figure 2 shows the risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool, 2019/2020. To reduce the risk of bias, only studies with a score ≥7 for their methodological quality were included in the meta-analysis.

Table 2.

Methodological qualification of the studies based on PEDro Scale for inclusion in the meta-analysis (2020)

Figure 2.

Evaluation of the risk of bias of the eight studies included in the review based on the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool, 2019/2020.

Results of individual studies according to the outcome

Time trial performance

Based on the heterogeneity among studies found in the analysis of the funnel chart and its respective symmetry (Figure 3), a fixed-effects model was adopted for the meta-analysis of the results. Five studies [16-20] with a total of 70 participants evaluated time trial performance following sodium bicarbonate or placebo supplementation. A non-significant favoritism fin was observed in the groups that used received placebo supplementation showed non-significantly better performance (slope = −0.75; 95% CI, −2.04 to 0.55; Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Funnel plot of the five studies that analyzed time trial performance.

Figure 4.

Forest plot of the relationship between placebo or sodium bicarbonate supplementation and time trial performance as a performance marker.

Time to exhaustion

Based on the heterogeneity among studies found in the analysis of the funnel chart and its respective asymmetry (Figure 5), a random-effects model was adopted for the meta-analysis of the results. Six studies [8,12,13 21–23] with a total of 85 participants evaluated the total time to exhaustion in the performed interventions following NaHCO₃ or placebo supplementation. Groups that used NaHCO₃ supplementation showed significantly better performance (SMD 1.48; 95% CI, 0.49 to 2.48; Figure 6).

Figure 5.

Funnel chart of the six studies that analyzed time to exhaustion as an outcome.

Figure 6.

Forest plot of the relationship between placebo or sodium bicarbonate supplementation and time to exhaustion as a performance marker.

DISCUSSION

The present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated randomized clinical trials of NaHCO₃ supplementation and its effects on sports performance in athletes and sports-people. Our findings show that NaHCO₃ has an ergogenic effect on time to exhaustion during exercise, but not on time trial performance. In practice, supplementation can increase the number of repetitions with a certain load or over a certain time to maintain power training at a higher intensity. These findings are based on studies that made use of a dosage of 0.3 g/kg 3 days, 240, 150, and 90 minutes before exercise [8,12,13,21-23].

Previous studies corroborate the results of our meta-analysis when demonstrating the ergogenic effect of supplementation on time to exhaustion as a measure of performance [12,22,23]. On the other hand, some studies [8,13,21] did not find a beneficial effect in time to exhaustion but found beneficial effects on metabolic markers, such as increased blood lactate concentration and glycolysis capacity during exercise. Danaher et al. [8] used a protocol that consisted of initial supramaximal efforts, which may have contributed to the low beneficial effect of NaHCO₃ in the maintenance of participants’ physical effort.

Interestingly, Hadzic et al. [24] in their systematic review of randomized and controlled studies, analyzed the effects of NaHCO₃ supplementation on performance during <4 mins and >4 mins exercise, so that they could contemplate diverse exercise and modalities, including cycling, swimming, running, boxing, tennis, and taekwondo, and their metabolic specificities. According to the authors, the duration of exercise is the main factor explaining the possible beneficial effects of NaHCO₃. Our study showed that out of the six studies that demonstrated an ergogenic effect on time to exhaustion, four studies had >4 min exercise duration, with a maximum of 49.5 min [23]. Thus, it seems that factors other than the duration of exercise are associated with the outcomes of NaHCO₃ supplementation.

These factors include training level (e.g., amateur, elite), and sex. Trained athletes have higher tamponade capacity and are, consequently, less responsive to supplementation [25]. On the other hand, NaHCO₃ is efficient in athletes who are trained using diverse exercises, such as supramaximal exercises and intermittent high-intensity sports activities, based on their abilities [9]. The lack of consensus in the literature demonstrates that the relationship between conditioning level and responsivity to NaHCO₃ remains inconclusive.

The reasons for the contrasting results between the studies are worth discussion, as the methodological limitations of the studies, make it possible to understand these discrepancies and highlight questions to be answered in further research. We observed that the studies had heterogeneous small sample sizes (the largest sample size in our review was 42 individuals), including individuals with varying levels of conditioning and sex, performing different exercise modalities. Regarding sex, it is important to highlight that the menstrual cycle can alter performance, and this is usually ignored. Furthermore, women showed more time to exhaustion in repetitive sprint exercises [26]. Factors associated with oxidative and glycolytic capacity, as well as neural factors, seem to be involved. Another factor that is associated with misunderstandings in the literature is the presence of “responsive” and “non-responsive,” [27] so that mechanisms that explain these different phenomena are unknown.

However, in this context, most included studies were double-blinded crossover studies, which are the “gold standard.” Nevertheless, none of these studies explained the efficacy of blindness by asking the participants to state which of the supplements was NaHCO₃ and which was placebo. Once NaHCO₃ is associated with side effects, such as gastrointestinal problems, it is possible that some participants may have identified the experimental treatment and thus influenced the results.

The dosages used and NaHCO₃ preparation varied significantly. Most studies used 0.3 g of NaHCO₃ per kg of body weight acutely (up to 240 minutes before the exercise). In addition, the pharmaceutical type used varied, including jelly capsules, tablets, and fluid solutions [8,12,13,16,20,21,23]. On the other hand, the effects of type (fluid solution or capsule) and time of consumption are also not clear, because the results of acute (0.5–4 h before exercise) or chronic intake of NaHCO₃ (three days before exercise) led to similar results [17,19]. This usual dosage is associated with gastrointestinal disorders, which may reduce athletes’ acceptance of the use of NaHCO₃ [6,7]. A method of avoiding this discomfort referred to as “loading,” has been discussed in the literature [28]. The accumulation of CO₂ in the intestine, due to supplementation, may cause abdominal distension and pain, nausea, and vomiting, which are serious and diverse types of side effects [9].

Only two studies performed loading [17,19]. Loading is the intake of small dosages of bicarbonate throughout the day, usually around three times (together with main meals). Theoretically, this protocol can be used in preparation for many events on successive days or to avoid periods of a high risk of intestinal disorders (close to physical exercise). Freis et al. noted that chronic intake of NaHCO₃ can increase the risk of cardiac dysrhythmia due to alterations in the concentration of potassium in the blood and urolithiasis due to the alkalization of the urine and sodium content [13]. Some authors, however, suggest that chronic use may be better than acute use [9,29]. After loading, plasma concentrations of bicarbonate are maintained even after the interruption of supplementation, so that blood can store extra NaHCO₃ and use it.

The works that had been included in the present systematic review are, in general, of good quality. An inherent but inevitable problem in studies of supplementation is the high risk of bias, as multiple factors can influence the outcomes. As previously mentioned, sample blinding has not been fully explained in detail. In addition, food intake during the experimental protocols has not been reported.

The results presented in this review confirm the potential of NaHCO₃ to increase time to exhaustion. Future studies with long-term supplementation are needed to determine whether chronic supplementation improves adaptation to physical training. Moreover, it is suggested that studies that consider the guarantee the efficacy of the blinding for the placebo and NaHCO₃ conditions and compare the results between individuals that can identify NaHCO₃ from those who cannot. Another point that needs attention is the shortage of studies that investigated supplementation in women and older people, so future studies should address this gap in the current literature.

The limitations of our study were the methodological classification of articles after filtering based on eligibility criteria. The classification of risk of bias was a determinant for the inclusion of studies in the meta-analysis [15]; therefore, some studies with relevant results may have been excluded due to lack of data or their partial provision. It is important to note that the variables associated with performance and fatigue are multifactorial, such as the time of intake of the supplement and the level of training of sports activity practitioners. However, specifically investigated the use of NaHCO₃ supplementation on the time trial performance and resistance to fatigue in general. Thus, future investigations should consider the influence of different intervening factors on performance indicators to better understand this phenomenon.

In conclusion, supplementation with NaHCO₃ has been used by coaches, physical trainers, and nutritionists in sports. The findings of this investigation indicate that supplementation with NaHCO₃ may improve the sports performance of athletes and practitioners of sports, so that time to exhaustion may be the most beneficial performance marker of this supplement, while time trial performance seems not to be influenced by NaHCO₃ supplementation. The findings of this review provide relevant information for sports professionals to make strategic decisions aimed at increasing their performance of athletes and sports practitioners in a specific way.

References

1. Edge J, Bishop D, Goodman C. Effects of chronic NaHCO₃ ingestion during interval training on changes to muscle buffer capacity, metabolism, and short-term endurance performance. J Appl Physiol 2006;101:918–25.

2. Maughan R. The athlete’s diet: nutritional goals and dietary strategies. Proc Nutr Soc 2002;61:87–96.

3. Lopes-Silva JP, Da Silva Santos JF, Artioli GG, Loturco I, Abbiss C, Franchini E. Sodium bicarbonate ingestion increases glycolytic contribution and improves performance during simulated taekwondo combat. Eur J Sport Sci 2018;18:431–40.

4. Forbes SC, Candow DG, Smith-Ryan AE, Hirsch KR, Roberts MD, VanDusseldorp TA, Stratton MT, Kaviani M, Little JP. Supplements and nutritional interventions to augment high-intensity interval training physiological and performance adaptations-a narrative review. Nutrients 2020;12:390.

5. Allen DG, Lamb GD, Westerblad H. Cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle fatigue. Hum Muscle Fatigue 2009;1:48–75.

6. Lancha Junior AH, de Salles Painelli V, Saunders B, Artioli GG. Nutritional strategies to modulate intracellular and extracellular buffering capacity during high-intensity exercise. Sport Med 2015;45:71–81.

7. Burke LM, Erdman KA, Thomas DT. Nutrition and athletic performance. Med Sci Sport Exerc 2016;48:543–68.

8. Danaher J, Gerber T, Wellard RM, Stathis CG. The effect of β-alanine and NaHCO₃ co-ingestion on buffering capacity and exercise performance with high-intensity exercise in healthy males. Eur J Appl Physiol 2014;114:1715–24.

9. McNaughton LR, Gough L, Deb S, Bentley D, Sparks SA. Recent developments in the use of sodium bicarbonate as an ergogenic aid. Curr Sports Med Rep 2016;15:233–44.

10. Grgic J, Rodriguez RF, Garofolini A, Saunders B, Bishop DJ, Schoenfeld BJ, Pedisic Z. Effects of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on muscular strength and endurance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport Med 2020;50:1361–75.

11. Durkalec-Michalski K, Zawieja EE, Podgórski T, Łoniewski I, Zawieja BE, Warzybok M, Jeszka J. The effect of chronic progressive-dose sodium bicarbonate ingestion on crossfit-like performance: a double-blind, randomized cross-over trial. PLoS One 2018;13:e0197480.

12. Ferreira LHB, Smolarek AC, Chilibeck PD, Barros MP, McAnulty SR, Schoenfeld B, Zandona BA, Souza-Junior T. High doses of sodium bicarbonate increase lactate levels and delay exhaustion in a cycling performance test. Nutrition 2019;60:94–9.

13. Freis T, Hecksteden A, Such U, Meyer T. Effect of sodium bicarbonate on prolonged running performance: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. PLoS One 2017;12:e018215.

14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.

15. de Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother 2009;55:129–33.

16. Gough LA, Deb SK, Sparks A, McNaughton LR. The Reproducibility of 4-km time trial (TT) performance following individualized sodium bicarbonate supplementation: a randomized controlled trial in trained cyclists. Sport Med - Open 2017;3:34.

17. Delextrat A, Mackessy S, Arceo-Rendon L, Scanlan A, Ramsbottom R, Calleja-Gonzalez J. Effects of three-day serial sodium bicarbonate loading on performance and physiological parameters during a simulated basketball test in female university players. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2018;28:547–52.

18. Hobson RM, Harris RC, Martin D, Smith P, Macklin B, Elliott-Sale KJ, Sale C. Effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on 2000-m rowing performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2014;9:139–44.

19. Joyce S, Minahan C, Anderson M, Osborne M. Acute and chronic loading of sodium bicarbonate in highly trained swimmers. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012;112:461–9.

20. Voskamp AE, van den Bos S, Foster C, de Koning JJ, Noordhof DA. The effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on the decline in gross efficiency during a 2000-m cycling time trial. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020;15:741–7.

21. Gough LA, Rimmer S, Osler CJ, Higgins MF. Ingestion of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) following a fatiguing bout of exercise accelerates postexercise acid-base balance recovery and improves subsequent high-intensity cycling time to exhaustion. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2017;27:429–38.

22. Rezaei S, Akbari K, Gahreman DE, Sarshin A, Tabben M, Kaviani M, Sadeghinikoo A, Koozehchian MS, Naderi A. Caffeine and sodium bicarbonate supplementation alone or together improve karate performance. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2019;16:44.

23. Egger F, Meyer T, Such U, Hecksteden A. Effects of sodium bicarbonate on high-intensity endurance performance in cyclists: A double-blind, randomized cross-over trial. PLoS One 2014;9:e114729.

24. Hadzic M, Eckstein ML, Schugardt M. The impact of sodium bicarbonate on performance in response to exercise duration in athletes: a systematic review. J Sport Sci Med 2019;18:271–81.

25. Peart DJ, Siegler JC, Vince R V. Practical recommendations for coaches and athletes: a meta-analysis of sodium bicarbonate use for athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res 2012;26:1975–83.

26. Laurent CM, Green JM, Bishop PA, Sjökvist J, Schumacker RE, Richardson MT, Curtner-Smith M. Effect of gender on fatigue and recovery following maximal intensity repeated sprint performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2010;50:243–53.

27. Wu CL, Shih MC, Yang CC, Huang MH, Chang CK. Sodium bicarbonate supplementation prevents skilled tennis performance decline after a simulated match. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2010;7:33.

28. Burke LM. Practical considerations for bicarbonate loading and sports performance. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser 2013;75:15–26.

29. Douroudos II, Fatouros IG, Gourgoulis V, Gourgoulis V, Jamurtas AZ, Tsitsios T, Hatzinikolaou A, Margonis K, Mavromatidis K, Taxildaris K. Dose-related effects of prolonged NaHCO₃ ingestion during high-intensity exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006;38:1746–53.

30. Price MJ, Simons C. The effect of sodium bicarbonate ingestion on high-intensity intermittent running and subsequent performance. J Strength Cond Res 2010;24:1834–42.

31. Siegler JC, Gleadall-Siddall DO. Sodium bicarbonate ingestion and repeated swim sprint performance. J Strength Cond Res 2010;24:3105–11.

32. Callahan MJ, Parr EB, Hawley JA, Burke LM. Single and combined effects of beetroot crystals and sodium bicarbonate on 4-km cycling time trial performance. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2017;27:271–8.

33. Macutkiewicz D, Sunderland C. Sodium bicarbonate supplementation does not improve elite women’s team sport running or field hockey skill performance. Physiol Rep 2018;6:e13818.

34. Gough LA, Rimmer S, Sparks SA, McNaughton LR, Higgins MF. Post-exercise supplementation of sodium bicarbonate improves acid-base balance recovery and subsequent high-intensity boxing specific performance. Front Nutr 2019;6:155.

35. Peinado AB, Holgado D, Luque-Casado A, Rojo-Tirado MA, Sanabria D, González C, Mateo-March M, Sánchez-Muñoz M, Calderón FJ, Zabala M. Effect of induced alkalosis on performance during a field-simulated BMX cycling competition. J Sci Med Sport 2018;22:335–41.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 17 clinical trials included in the systematic review

Author	Number at GC (nC); Number at GE (nE); Mean age and SD (I)	Sport modality (Sport); Evaluation protocol (Protocol)	Placebo substance of control group (SupC); Supplementation of the experimental group (SupE)	Time trial in seconds (TT); Time to exhaustion in seconds (TE)	Model of Clinical Trial
Price et al. [30]	nC: 8	Sport: Running	SupC: 45 mg/kg/pc of sodium chloride (NaCl)	TE C: 75±22	Randomized
	nE: 8	Protocol: 20×24 s at 100% vVO₂, followed by 1× up to exhaustion at 120% vVO₂	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 60 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 78±22
	I: 20.3±1		SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 60 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 78±22
Siegler et al. [31]	nC: 6	Sport: Swimming	SupC: 45 mg/kg/pc of sodium chloride (NaCl)	TT C: 163.2±25.6	Randomized, single-blind
	nE: 6	Protocol: 8×25 m at 100% with 5-s intervals	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 150 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 159.4±25.4
	I: Non-specified	Protocol: 8×25 m at 100% with 5-s intervals	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 150 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 159.4±25.4
Joyce et al. [19]	nC: 8	Sport: Swimming	SupC: Methylcellulose capsules	TT C: 119.02±5.82	Randomized, double-blind
	nE: 8	Protocol: 1×200 m	SupE: 0.1 g/kg/pc of BS, 3×/day for 3 days before the protocol	TT E: 118.53±5.64
	I: 19±3	at 100%		TT E: 118.53±5.64
Danaher et al. [8]	nC: 8	Sport: Cycling	SupC: 0.3 g/kg/pc of calcium carbonate (CaCO₃)	TE C: 129±10.94	Randomized, crossover, double-blind.
	nE: 8	Protocol: 1×110% Wmax till exhaustion at 80–100 rpm	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 132±13.48
	I: 26.2±1,9	Protocol: 1×110% Wmax till exhaustion at 80–100 rpm	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 132±13.48
Egger et al. [23]	nC: 21	Sport: Cycling	SupC: 4 g of sodium chloride (NaCl)	TE C: 2700±570	Randomized, crossover; double-blind
	nE: 21	Protocol: 1×30min at 95% IAT, followed by 1× until exhaustion at 110% IAT	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 60 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 2970±690
	I: 24±8		SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 60 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 2970±690
Hobson et al. [18]	nC: 20	Sport: Rowing	SupC: 0.3 g/kg/pc of maltodextrin	TT C: 412±15.1	Randomized, crossover, double-blind
	nE: 20	Protocol: 2×2 km at 100%, with an interval of 48 h between assessments.	SupE: 0.2 g/kg/pc of BS, 240 minutes before the protocol and 0.1 g/kg/pc of BS 60 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 410.7±14.9
	I: 23±4			TT E: 410.7±14.9
Callahan et al. [32]	nC: 8	Sport: Cycling	SupC: 0.3 g/kg/pc of maltodextrin	TT C: 338.1±18.04	Double-blind
	nE: 8	Protocol: 1×4 km at 100%	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 150 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 335.78±16.94
	I: 34.7±7	Protocol: 1×4 km at 100%	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 150 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 335.78±16.94
Freis et al. [13]	nC: 18	Sport: Race	SupC: 4g of sodium chloride (NaCl)	TE C: 2358±336	Randomized, crossover, double-blind
	nE: 18	Protocol: 1×30 min at 95% IAT, followed by 1× until exhaustion 110% IAT	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 2376±336
	I: 27.9±9.1		SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 2376±336
Gough et al. [16]	nC: 11	Sport: Cycling	SupC: Water and gooseberry	TT C: 381.7±13.1	Randomized, double-blind
	nE: 11	Protocol: 1×4 km at 100%	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, evaluating the levels of blood BS up to the peak	TT E: 373.5±13.1
	I: 32±9	Protocol: 1×4 km at 100%		TT E: 373.5±13.1
Gough et al. [21]	nC: 9	Sport: Cycling	SupC: 0.1 g/kg/pc of sodium chloride (NaCl)	TE C: 211±65	Crossover, double-blind.
	nE: 9	Protocol: 2×100% until exhaustion with 90-min interval	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 246±70
	I: 23±2	Protocol: 2×100% until exhaustion with 90-min interval	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 246±70
Delextrat et al. [17]	nC: 15	Sport: Basketball	SupC: Non-specified	TT C: 31.3±1.96	Randomized, crossover, double-blind
	nE: 15	Protocol: 17× BEST protocol (Sprint, race, change direction and jumps)	SupE: 0.4 g/kg/pc of BS, for 3 days before the protocol	TT E: 30.58±2.03
	I: 23.3±3.4		SupE: 0.4 g/kg/pc of BS, for 3 days before the protocol	TT E: 30.58±2.03
Macutkiewicz et al. [33]	nC: 8	Sport: Field hockey	SupC: 0.2 g/kg/pc of maltodextrin	TT C: 87.9±6.9	Randomized, crossover, single-blind
	nE: 8	Protocol: 6× FHST protocol (Dribbles, passes and kicks - from beacon)	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 89±7.8
	I: 23±5		SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 89±7.8
Ferreira et al. [12]	nC: 21	Sport: Cycling	SupC: 0.3 g/kg/pc of calcium carbonate (CaCO₃)	TE C: 68.03±5.41	Randomized, crossover, double-blind
	nE: 21	Protocol: 3× until exhaustion at 80 rpm and load of 5%, with 7-d interval	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 30 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 76.42±4.41
	I: 20±2		SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 30 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 76.42±4.41
Gough et al. [34]	nC: 7	Sport: Boxing	SupC: 0.1 g/kg/pc of sodium chloride (NaCl)	TE C: 73±78	Double-blind
	nE: 7	Protocol: 1×90% VO₂, with 3×3 min simulation of round and 1×90% VO₂, with 75-min interval between each assessment	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 60 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 164±90
	I: 27.1±5.1		SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 60 minutes before the protocol	TE E: 164±90
Peinado et al. [35]	nC: 12	Sport: BMX cycling	SupC: 45 mg/kg/pc of sodium chloride (NaCl)	TT C: 31.32 (30.60–32.05)	Randomized, crossover, double-blind
	nE: 12	Protocol: 3×400 m at 100%, on an official course with a 15-min interval between each assessment	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 31.37 (30.65–32.10)
	I: 19.2±3.4		SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 90 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 31.37 (30.65–32.10)
Rezaei et al. [22]	nC: 8	Sport: Karate	SupC: Cellulose capsules	TE C: 636±39	Randomized, crossover, double-blind
	nE: 8	Protocol: 2× sequences of blows at 100%, until exhaustion with progressive reduction of interval.	SupE: 0.1 g/kg/pc of BS at 120, 90, and 60 min before the protocol	TE E: 693±28
	I: 20.5±2.4			TE E: 693±28
Voskamp et al. [20]	nC: 16	Sport: Cycling	SupC: Sunflower oil and magnesium capsules	TT C: 164.2±5	Randomized, crossover, double-blind
	nE: 16	Protocol: 1×2 km at 100%	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 150 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 164.3±5
	I: 27.6±6.9	Protocol: 1×2 km at 100%	SupE: 0.3 g/kg/pc of BS, 150 minutes before the protocol	TT E: 164.3±5

VO₂: volume of oxygen that is captured and distributed in the body; vVO₂, velocity of VO₂; Wmax, maximum power in watts; IAT, individual anaerobic threshold; BEST, basketball exercise stimulation test; FHST, field hockey skill test; rpm, rotations per minute; BW, body weight; g/kg/pc, grams per kilogram of body weight; mg/kg/pc, milligrams per kilogram of body weight; C: control group; E: experimental group.

Author	Score (0-11)	Items from the PEDro Scale
Author	Score (0-11)	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
Price et al.	5	N	Y	N	Y	N	N	N	N	Y	Y	Y
Siegler et al.	6	N	Y	N	N	Y	N	N	Y	Y	Y	Y
Joyce et al.	10	N	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y
Danaher et al.	9	N	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	Y
Egger et al.	8	N	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	Y
Hobson et al.	8	N	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	Y
Callahan et al.	6	N	N	N	Y	Y	Y	N	N	Y	Y	Y
Freis et al.	8	N	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	N	N	Y	Y	S
Gough et al.	8	Y	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	N	N	Y	Y	Y
Gough et al.	7	Y	N	N	Y	Y	Y	N	N	Y	Y	Y
Delextrat et al.	7	N	N	Y	Y	Y	Y	N	N	Y	Y	Y
Macutkiewicz et al.	6	N	Y	N	Y	Y	N	N	N	Y	Y	Y
Ferreira et al.	9	Y	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	Y
Gough et al.	8	N	N	Y	Y	Y	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	Y
Peinado et al.	7	N	Y	N	Y	Y	Y	N	N	Y	Y	Y
Rezaei et al.	10	N	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y